[MIP6D-NG Support] ping6 not working

[Neha Patel]

Hello,

Thanks for quick reply. As per your instructions I configured one  laptop
other than HA,MN,CN to do radvd advertisements since i don't have ipv6
network over here. MN,HA,CN are able to ping each other before mip6d-ng
starts,but same problem persists i am not able to ping MN in any
context.however I am able to see BU-BA pairs on console and only BU pairs
in wireshark.

-config file contents are as follows:

*MN*

loglevel = 2
interfaces = { "wlan0" }
md-delete-delay = 8
mn {
        home-address = "2001:db5:ffff:0:8ea9:82ff:fe5e:8604"
        ha-address   = "2001:db5:ffff:0:219:d2ff:fe75:63a9"
        lifetime = 40
}
bid-pri wlan0 {
        # Lower value indicates higher priority
        priority = 10
}
api {
listening_port = 1234
}

*HA *

loglevel = 2
ha {
    address = "2001:db5:ffff:0:219:d2ff:fe75:63a9"
    interface = "wlan0"
}
api {
    listening_port = 1234
}

What is the problem in my setup?

Thanks and regards,
Neha

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:15 PM, BOKOR Laszlo <goodzi at mcl.hu> wrote:

>
> Hi Neha,
>
> thanks for your e-mail. First: if you are pinging the MN from an other
> node in the network then the HA, it should work. The ping not working shows
> that there is something wrong, so neither telnet,ftp,ssh,http nor anything
> else will work. An important test:
>
> -before starting mip6d-ng both on the MN and the HA, make sure that the MN
> pings from HA and vica versa. The other node in the network (Correspondent
> Node, CN), should be pinged as well.
>
> -after starting mip6d-ng both on the MN and the HA, the CN should ping
> both the MN and the HA nodes, and any IPv6 traffic should go fine between
> the MN-CN context.
>
> -In the config your colleague sent me I can not see the "interfaces"
> section, e.g.:
>
> interfaces = { "wlan0" }
>
> Please use the below format:
>
> MN SIDE
>
> loglevel = 2
> interfaces = { "wlan0" }
> md-delete-delay = 8
> mn {
>         home-address = "2001:db8:ffff::1"
>         ha-address   = "2001:db8:ffff::1000"
>         lifetime = 40
> }
> bid-pri wlan0 {
>         # Lower value indicates higher priority
>         priority = 10
> }
> api {
> listening_port = 1234
> }
>
> HA SIDE
>
> loglevel = 2
> ha {
>     address = "2001:db8:ffff::1000"
>     interface = "eth0"
> }
> api {
>     listening_port = 1234
> }
>
> -in whireshark use the display filter "mipv6"
>
> -please don't use radvd on the HA. Configure a separate router with at
> least two different wifi networks (links) for the handover tests. On that
> router/routers you can use radvd for the prefix advertisement on the wifi
> links.
>
> Best regards,
> goodzi
>
> --
> László BOKOR, Ph.D.
> Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME)
> Department of Networked Systems and Services (HIT)
> Tel: +36-1-463-2048, Fax: +36-1-463-3263
> web: http://medianets.hu/staff/laszlo-bokor/
>
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2016, Neha Patel wrote:
>
> Hello,
>>
>> I tried to ping6 MN from node other than HA still i am not able to ping6
>> MN. Also MN is not able to ping6 any of
>> the nodes.I have also tried telnet,ftp,ssh,http but it failed.
>> how to test mobile IP ??
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Neha
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:47 PM, BOKOR Laszlo <goodzi at mcl.hu> wrote:
>>
>>       Hi Neha,
>>
>>       we are aware of one known issue: it is not working when you are
>> pinging the HA from the MN. If you are
>>       pinging in other relation and other nodes, it should work.
>>
>>       Best regards,
>>       goodzi
>>
>>       --
>>       László BOKOR, Ph.D.
>>       Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME)
>>       Department of Networked Systems and Services (HIT)
>>       Tel: +36-1-463-2048, Fax: +36-1-463-3263
>>       web: http://medianets.hu/staff/laszlo-bokor/
>>
>>       On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Neha Patel wrote:
>>
>>             Hello,
>>
>>             I have successfully installed mip6d-ng for my research work.
>> But in order to test mobile
>>             Ip I tried to use ping6 but
>>             whenever i start the mip6d-ng ping6 stops working.what can be
>> the reason for this??
>>
>>             Thanks and Regards,
>>             Neha
>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mcl.hu/pipermail/support/attachments/20160407/33963b72/attachment.html>