[MIP6D-NG Support] Testbed configuration
Attila Brájer
attila.brajer at yahoo.com
Wed Mar 27 00:51:43 CET 2013
Dear András,
Thanks for your reply (in all subjects)! I've managed to solve the Home Agent (HA) routing issue. Beside the forwarding, I also had to disable the SLAAC procedure for the interface connected to the home link, then configured a static ipv6 routing entry towards the IPv6 router. So now there are two routers on the home link with one operating as a HA. Also it can reach now all hosts in the network vica versa.
BR,
Attila
________________________________
From: András Takács <wakoond at wakoond.hu>
To: Attila Brájer <attila.brajer at yahoo.com>
Cc: "support at mip6d-ng.net" <support at mip6d-ng.net>
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2013 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: [MIP6D-NG Support] Testbed configuration
Dear Attila,
We are operating a virtual test network. It contains a Home Agent, a Mobile Node, and three Access Routers. On the Home Agent you don't need any extra configuration. To enable packet forwarding (acting as router) on the Home Agent, you should to enable forwarding:
sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
Currently we're working on a real test network with Wifi and 3G connection, cell phone, etc…
You're right, a good configuration guide is missing from the homepage. I'm working on code documentation and new how to guides. These will be available soon (maybe one or two weeks).
Anyway, if you have any other question, please do not hesitate…
Regards,
András
--
András Takács
Web: http://www.wakoond.hu
Email: wakoond at wakoond.hu
Skype: wakoond
On Mar 22, 2013, at 3:48 PM, Attila Brájer <attila.brajer at yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear Experts,
>
>
>I'd like to ask what kind of testbed configuration used so far during mip6d-ng tests, i.e.: virtualization techniques (nodes present logically on the same host), dedicated infrastructure (physically separated nodes), etc ...
>I have a latter one network, HA and MN located in separated IPv6 subnets (1 hop IPv6 router between them). So far I only tested a foreign link MN presence and a simple binding registration process, what was successful.
>My problem is that I think the HA doesn't operate as a router on the home link. No radvd runs on the HA, neither state changement happened in "kernel parameters", like: accept_ra, forwarding when the mip6d-ng ran (only proxy_ndp was set automatically: 0->1).
>Does the HA have any prerequisites before starting the daemon (like umip-mip6d has)? What I suggest is to make a brief documentation on the mip6d-ng.net about the testbed configuration, or link to the umip.org documentation if it is useful for mip6d-ng also. What do You think?
>
>
>BR,
>Attila Brájer_______________________________________________
>Support mailing list
>Support at mip6d-ng.net
>http://mcl.hu/mailman/listinfo/support
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mcl.hu/pipermail/support/attachments/20130326/15581086/attachment.html>
More information about the Support
mailing list